Deep Dive into Osgood Perkins' Experimental Horror 'Keeper'

Welcome to our latest deep dive into the cinematic complexities of experimental horror, with a spotlight on Osgood Perkins' controversial new film, "Keeper." In this piece, we aim to unravel the mixed critical reception by dissecting the film's eerie atmosphere versus its perplexing narrative structure.

The Experiment of Horror

Osgood Perkins presents "Keeper" as an experimental horror film that garners mixed reviews due to its controversial nature. Positioned against a critical assessment from Variety, the movie splits audiences with its atmospheric promise on one side, and on the other, a severe lack of coherent narrative logic that could be considered unforgivable by some.

Setting the Scene

The discussion kicks off by acknowledging Perkins' bold attempt at experimentation within the horror genre. However, the film's execution has been critiqued as unfocused, akin to a "random horror mix tape" from Perkins' own imagination projected onto the screen. Such a vivid description suggests a lack of discipline rather than a unique vision, heightening the debate over the movie's impact.

Psychological Thrills & Clever Shortcuts

Despite its flaws, "Keeper" earns acclaim for its opening with a disturbing atmosphere. The narrative smartly parallels a serial monogamist tendency with that of a serial killer, portraying men as potential predators. It’s a compelling psychological setup heightened by protagonist Malcolm’s portrayal as a seemingly safe yet secretly predatory figure.

Narrative Disruptions & Disconnections

As the horror unfolds, the film introduces unsettling elements—Malcolm's cousin Darren and the enigmatic Minka—both of whom serve as narrative disruptions rather than advances. Minka’s interaction with a bizarre cake box and the ensuing surreal scenes reveal the film's unpredictable trajectory. This emphasizes the critic’s point about the film’s narrative becoming unhinged with illogical transitions between supposedly disparate horror tropes.

Structural Failure vs Atmospheric Success

Critics argue that Perkins abandons his own narrative components, leading to an experience that feels like four different movies compiled into one. While the chaotic narrative is frustrating, "Keeper" does earn praise for its technical execution. Jeremy Cox’s cinematography infuses a refined, stark natural aesthetic that Cox refers to as "woodland austerity," contrasting sharply with the narrative’s chaos.

Thematic Threads & Musical Cues

Perkins subtly reveals his thematic intentions through the chosen music for the film’s closing credits—songs centered around romance, betrayal, and relational games. The music provides a thematic thread suggesting that the film’s violence correlates to an inability to form binding human connections.

Final Critical Takeaways

Ultimately, the criticisms directed at Perkins accuse him of failing to commit to a cohesive filmmaking style. The film’s mixtape approach is seen as a means of avoiding creative discipline rather than presenting a coherent artistic vision.

The Big Question

For viewers, the challenge lies in determining whether the film’s atmospheric strengths justify the accompanying narrative frustration. Is "Keeper" an experimental horror trying too hard to be unique, or does its fragmented logic form an avant-garde creative expression, demanding an exceptional level of interpretative engagement from its audience?

As we compare "Keeper" with films like "Skinamarink," praised for its consistent minimalist narrative approach, we are led to confront significant questions about the very nature of cinematic experimentation.

In closing, we invite you to explore "Keeper" with your discernment lenses on. Decide for yourself whether Perkins' bold thematic explorations and atmospheric triumphs can romance you into overlooking the film’s seemingly chaotic storytelling.

Listen to the full podcast episode here!